Power of the pen
- By Bhishmadev Seebaluck
- Published 8th August, 2008
“There are only two powers in the world, the sword and the pen; and in the end the former is always conquered by the latter.” – Napoleon Bonaparte
My dear Billy,
As you know, the English have coined a shorter, more precise, more palatable version of the above. They have compressed it simply into “The pen is mightier than the sword.” But I am sometimes tempted to doubt the veracity of this statement. Is the pen really more powerful? Napoleon ought to know because he has valiantly wielded the sword, although not so much the pen.
But with the number of impotent pens being brandished about, the sword seems to be standing better chances these days. Don’t forget that “sword” is made up of “word” in a very large measure.
“Take away the sword; states can be saved without it. Bring the pen!” wrote Edward Bulwer-Lytton. But that was centuries ago. With the passage of time, however, the sword has become an obsolete instrument of destruction, replaced by an arsenal of other more sophisticated and a million times more deadly weapons. They are today fabricating nuclear weapons which they have invented to destroy the world in an attempt of saving it. Saving it? From what? From whom? For whom?
The pen still endures to lead a lonely, peaceful battle, and to prove to the world that “The ink of the scholar is more sacred than the blood of the martyr,” as Prophet Muhammad asserted centuries ago.
Sir Thomas Browne wrote somewhere that “Scholars are men of peace; they bear no arms, but their pens are sharper than the sword; they give a louder report than thunder.”
But the pen is today having to contend with a number of rivals, chief among whom is the computer. More and more people are discarding the pen in favour of the computer. If the trend continues, we shall be having more computer key pressers in the future than writers. There are also those who send messages through the mobile phone instead of using pen and paper to write letters.
The computer and the mobile phone have advantages that a poor pen can never provide. Lord Byron called his “gray” goose-quill “nature’s noblest gift.” Had he and his contemporaries had access to
the “Word” on the “Windows” of the computer, they would certainly have produced so many more works to enrich the range of English and world literature.
I hate to say this, my dear Billy, but I have just lost my pen. Not that somebody has stolen it, but I have unfortunately misplaced it somewhere. I only hope that I find it again safe and sound some time, somewhere. I don’t know how it is with other people, but on the rare occasions that I have had to part with a pen, I have felt a certain pang of melancholy. It’s like I have lost a dear friend, a close, intimate companion from whom I have been suddenly estranged. Otherwise, I take all precautions to keep my pens as long as possible.
My pen thus becomes a trusted confidant that commits to paper my deepest thoughts and most profound feelings. It is a privileged witness of my changing moods, of the joys and sorrows that visit me. Over the years it has also become the instrument that procures my daily bread for me.
Those who manipulate the pen must be very careful about the use they put it to. They must think a number of times before writing down a word on paper. It should be a law that if you use a word without knowing what it means, you go to jail.
Talking about words it has often baffled me why “abbreviation” should be such a long word. Have you realized that the word “duck” is 75% obscene? Or that “Fragile” on a packet is often interpreted by postal workers as “Please throw with force”?
At school they taught me spell words that I have never had cause to write again, words like “myrrh,” “scimitar,” “obsequious.” Others learned words that they were never inclined to use again in their lives, words like “Good morning,” “Thank you,” “Please,” “Sorry.” I have also noticed that if you take hyphens seriously while writing, you may go mad. On the other hand, there is a great outcry that the English language is going to the dogs in Mauritius. But I have often wondered that even if you learn to write correct English, for whom are you going to write it?
By the way, I am fed up being corrected by the computer whenever I write words correctly, for example, there’s nothing that causes more harassment than when you write “colour” and the computer underlines it in red for you, as if you were the biggest moron around.
My dear Billy,
As you know, the English have coined a shorter, more precise, more palatable version of the above. They have compressed it simply into “The pen is mightier than the sword.” But I am sometimes tempted to doubt the veracity of this statement. Is the pen really more powerful? Napoleon ought to know because he has valiantly wielded the sword, although not so much the pen.
But with the number of impotent pens being brandished about, the sword seems to be standing better chances these days. Don’t forget that “sword” is made up of “word” in a very large measure.
“Take away the sword; states can be saved without it. Bring the pen!” wrote Edward Bulwer-Lytton. But that was centuries ago. With the passage of time, however, the sword has become an obsolete instrument of destruction, replaced by an arsenal of other more sophisticated and a million times more deadly weapons. They are today fabricating nuclear weapons which they have invented to destroy the world in an attempt of saving it. Saving it? From what? From whom? For whom?
The pen still endures to lead a lonely, peaceful battle, and to prove to the world that “The ink of the scholar is more sacred than the blood of the martyr,” as Prophet Muhammad asserted centuries ago.
Sir Thomas Browne wrote somewhere that “Scholars are men of peace; they bear no arms, but their pens are sharper than the sword; they give a louder report than thunder.”
But the pen is today having to contend with a number of rivals, chief among whom is the computer. More and more people are discarding the pen in favour of the computer. If the trend continues, we shall be having more computer key pressers in the future than writers. There are also those who send messages through the mobile phone instead of using pen and paper to write letters.
The computer and the mobile phone have advantages that a poor pen can never provide. Lord Byron called his “gray” goose-quill “nature’s noblest gift.” Had he and his contemporaries had access to
I hate to say this, my dear Billy, but I have just lost my pen. Not that somebody has stolen it, but I have unfortunately misplaced it somewhere. I only hope that I find it again safe and sound some time, somewhere. I don’t know how it is with other people, but on the rare occasions that I have had to part with a pen, I have felt a certain pang of melancholy. It’s like I have lost a dear friend, a close, intimate companion from whom I have been suddenly estranged. Otherwise, I take all precautions to keep my pens as long as possible.
My pen thus becomes a trusted confidant that commits to paper my deepest thoughts and most profound feelings. It is a privileged witness of my changing moods, of the joys and sorrows that visit me. Over the years it has also become the instrument that procures my daily bread for me.
Those who manipulate the pen must be very careful about the use they put it to. They must think a number of times before writing down a word on paper. It should be a law that if you use a word without knowing what it means, you go to jail.
Talking about words it has often baffled me why “abbreviation” should be such a long word. Have you realized that the word “duck” is 75% obscene? Or that “Fragile” on a packet is often interpreted by postal workers as “Please throw with force”?
At school they taught me spell words that I have never had cause to write again, words like “myrrh,” “scimitar,” “obsequious.” Others learned words that they were never inclined to use again in their lives, words like “Good morning,” “Thank you,” “Please,” “Sorry.” I have also noticed that if you take hyphens seriously while writing, you may go mad. On the other hand, there is a great outcry that the English language is going to the dogs in Mauritius. But I have often wondered that even if you learn to write correct English, for whom are you going to write it?
By the way, I am fed up being corrected by the computer whenever I write words correctly, for example, there’s nothing that causes more harassment than when you write “colour” and the computer underlines it in red for you, as if you were the biggest moron around.
|
Typo/Layout Correction Found a typo? Or the layout seems messed up? Please send us your correction or the article link to help us keep this website as accurate as possible. Vous avez remarqué une erreur de typo ou de mise en page ? Veuillez nous faire parvenir votre correction ou l’adresse de l’article afin de nous aider à rendre notre site encore plus fiable. |
1 Response to "Power of the pen" 
|
said this on 09 Aug 2008 12:58:24 PM MUT
Dear Mr Seebaluck
I would like to bring my contribution to your piece which I have enjoyed reading. « The pen is mightier than the sword » is an expression used figuratively. As you rightly pointed out, centuries ago the Prophet Muhammad said « The ink of the scholar is more sacred than the blood of the martyr ». In fact, the very first revelation to the Holy Prophet was « Read » [« Iqra »] since he could neither read nor write. But this was not a revelation just for him, but for the whole of humanity. Shruti texts, which predate Islam, also point in the same direction. Napoleon Bonaparte borrowed from the saying of the Prophet because his vision was to form a United States of Europe based on the principles of the Holy Qur’an. Similarly, when John F. Kennedy said « Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country », he borrowed from the Maronite Christian Lebanese author Kahlil Gibran. This is all fine. It does not truly matter who said what as long as the idea and the message survive and as long as the truth is not distorted. In line with your correct reasoning, if the Holy Qur’an were revealed today, the Prophet would have given examples, perhaps not in terms of horses, camels, swords, but in terms of computers, guided missiles, satellites. But the basic message is the same, and the expression « The pen is mightier than the sword » survives in whatever context. As far as Word auto correction is concerned, this how the European-Americans think English words have to be spelt because they are still trying to forge an identity for themselves, after they stole the land of the natives and butchered them. I often turn off the auto correction. English is not truly our language. We are forced to learn it because it is a most important language to learn in our day and age. English was a peasant language. The bourgeoisie used to speak French. Whatever our spelling problems, we write and speak much better English that the English person writes and/or speaks Hindi or Arabic, if any at all. We have to learn to live with Europeans without becoming Europeanised, else we lose our identities. I am totally against the profuse amount of English used in Hindi films nowadays. Hindustanis are becoming more and more ashamed of their superior languages and, consequently, of who they are. This is why, papers like Sunday Vani should still have been sold today. There is no reason why Harish Bhai could not revive this paper since he has the knowhow. The pen is indeed mightier than the sword, through which people will learn how to be proud of their cultures and religions and not let others take over them. Best regards Rafic Soormally London |
Author/Admin)








